Fitting Lanchester Equations by Dr. Thomas Lucas (NPS) has now been posted to our YouTube channel. It was his presentation given at the 21st HAAC in September 2022. The briefing runs 54:20 with a few minutes of questions and discussion afterwards: (5) Fitting Lanchester Equations: Lucas – YouTube
We have also done a few blog posts on Lanchester equations:Â
Lanchester equations have been weighed…. | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
TDI Friday Read: The Lanchester Equations | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
The Lanchester Equations and Historical Warfare | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Beyond Lanchester | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
The viewgraphs for these briefings were previous posted here: Presentations from HAAC – Fitting Lanchester Equations | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
The schedule for our next conference is here: Schedule for the Second Historical Analysis Annual Conference (HAAC), 17 – 19 October 2023 | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Not exactly related, but T.N.D got a mention:
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/back-trenches
“The historian Trevor Dupuy estimated that in World War II, around 50 percent of casualties were caused by artillery, which means that on average, it inflicted about three casualties per hundred rounds fired. In World War I, the figure was about two soldiers wounded or killed per hundred rounds fired…”
-Actually, IIRC, he wrote that it was more like 70% (difference between “dead” and “casualties”, perhaps) in WWII.
Thanks. He didn’t footnote the quote. May look further into this.
TND, Attrition, figure 35 on p. 59.
US battle casualties due to artillery or mortar shells:
WWI: 71%
WWII: 56%
Korea: 66%
Viet Nam: 43%
Thanks.