The Economist published an article last month called “The war in Ukraine shows how technology is changing the battlefield.” The subtitle is “But mass still counts, argues Shashank Joshi in the first of seven chapters of a special report on the future of warfare.” The link is here: The war in Ukraine shows how technology is changing the battlefield (economist.com). The headline in the actual (hard-copy) July 8-14 issue was “Ypres with AI: The war in Ukraine shows how technology has changed the battlefield. But mass still counts, argues Shashank Joshi.” Not sure why they have two different headlines.
I am quoted in the article. This took me by surprise as I had not talked or exchanged emails with Mr. Joshi in a few months. A well-read friend called and told me.Â
The specific quote is:Â
This jeopardy is reflected in a curiously sparse battlefield. In Ukraine some 350,000 Russian troops are arrayed on a front line stretching 1,200 km (750 miles) – around 300 men per km and, at times last year, less than half that. That is around a tenth of the average for the same area in the second world war, notes Chirstopher Lawrence, head of the Dupuy Institute, which collects such data. Battalions of several hundred men fill areas that would once have been covered by brigades of a few thousand.
In theory, say Mr. Lawrence, this seems a ripe environment for attackers. Thin front lines are easier to break through. And new sensors, more accurate munitions and better digital networks make it easier to find and strike targets. The catch is that attackers must concentrate their forces to pierce well-defended front lines, as Ukraine is now trying to do with its counter-offensive. And such concentrations can be detected and struck – not always, but more often than in the past…
Yea, I said something like that. Don’t remember exactly when or where.
Anyhow, thank you Mr. Joshi for the quote.
Â
P.S. A few related references:
Density of Deployment in Ukraine | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Economist Article on Urban Warfare | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Economist Article on Russian Casualty Estimates | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
So Dupuy’s Proximity, Dispersion and Protection maxim still applies.
Yep. See Chapter 13 of War by Numbers, in particular page 167.