Was searching around on YouTube yesterday on “Dupuy Institute” and ran across this video: People Always Get This Wrong – YouTube. This was posted three weeks ago. Preston Stewart is not known to me.
I am called out by name on 5:14 in the video. It is clear he pulled up one of our old reports, the charts at 6:00 and 6:14 are ours. The chart at 6:36 is ours and was later republished in War by Numbers. It appears to be abbreviated. The complete chart is on page 10 of War by Numbers. The chart at 6:44 has also been republished in War by Numbers. The chart at 7:30 is from our reports. The one high odds attack that failed on that chart was an Iraqi attack against the coalition. See: TDI – The Dupuy Institute Publications.
Anyhow, would recommend that Mr. Stewart look at Trevor Dupuy’s Understanding War, Chapter 4: The Three-to-One Theory of Combat, and at my book War by Numbers, Chapter 2: Force Ratios.
Also, he might might the following blog posts are useful:
Summation of Human Factors and Force Ratio posts | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Force Ratios at Kharkov and Kursk, 1943 | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Force Ratios in the Arab-Israeli Wars (1956-1973) | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Summation of Human Factors and Force Ratio posts | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Force Ratios and CRTs | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Talking Force Ratios Once Again | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org)
Anyhow, thank you Preston Stewart for the call out.
I will be doing a presentation on Force Ratios at the second HAAC on 17 October and will be doing a similar presentation in Norway in early November. See: Schedule for the Second Historical Analysis Annual Conference (HAAC), 17 – 19 October 2023 | Mystics & Statistics (dupuyinstitute.org).
We do have a YouTube site: The Dupuy Institute – YouTube. So far the only video posted is a test video. The husky is named Max. We may be posting some more videos there in the next couple of months. There are three subscribers to our site. I gather we can get some funding if we get a 100,000 or more subscribers. So only 99,997 to go. Please subscribe.
Only 99,994 left now 🙂
Well, we did do a collection of videos of the presentations from the first historical analysis conference. So, I am probably going to learn how to edit those and start posting them up on the YouTube site. So there should be more content appearing in the next couple of months.
Nice, I was hoping to see some of those presentations.
There will be, just depends when I get to it.
Good luck with YouTube. You guys are excellent (and, compared to say, ISW, far above the competition).
Thanks. I wish I had their budget.
I wish you did too, to be honest. I currently have more children then funds, so at least you aren’t alone in the money hole, haha.
I don’t understand why ISW gets the size, funding and reach that it does. I don’t want to be too harsh, but their analysis generally seems more concerned with sounding professional and hitting political points then competency.
I found another one on force ratios. I can’t fully access, but you probably know someone who can.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2538780
Thanks. I have not read that article yet. The first three paragraphs sort of gives me a warning that it won’t be a particularly good use of my time.
https://www.mearsheimer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/A0013.pdf