As I stated in a previous post, I am not aware of any other major validation efforts done in the last 25 years other than what we have done. Still, there is one other effort that needs to be mentioned. This is described in a 2017 report: Using Combat Adjudication to Aid in Training for Campaign Planning.pdf
I gather this was work by J-7 of the Joint Staff to develop Joint Training Tools (JTT) using the Combat Adjudication Service (CAS) model. There are a few lines in the report that warm my heart:
- “It [JTT] is based on and expanded from Dupuy’s Quantified Judgement Method of Analysis (QJMA) and Tactical Deterministic Model.”
- “The CASÂ design used Dupuy’s data tables in whole or in part (e.g. terrain, weather, water obstacles, and advance rates).”
- “Non-combat power variables describing the combat environment and other situational information are listed in Table 1, and are a subset of variables (Dupuy, 1985).”
- “The authors would like to acknowledge COL Trevor N. Dupuy for getting Michael Robel interested in combat modeling in 1979.”
Now, there is a section labeled verification and validation. Let me quote from that:
CAS results have been “Face validated” against the following use cases:
-
- The 3:1 rules. The rule of thumb postulating an attacking force must have at least three times the combat power of the defending force to be successful.
- 1st (US) Infantry Divison vers 26th (IQ) Infantry Division during Desert Storm
- The Battle of 73 Easting: 2nd ACR versus elements of the Iraqi Republican Guards
- 3rd (US) Infantry Division’s first five days of combat during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF)
Each engagement is conducted with several different terrain and weather conditions, varying strength percentages and progresses from a ground only engagement to multi-service engagements to test the effect of CASP [Close Air Support] and interdiction on the ground campaign. Several shortcomings have been detected, but thus far ground and CASP match historical results. However, modeling of air interdiction could not be validated.
So, this is a face validation based upon three cases. This is more than what I have seen anyone else do in the last 25 years.