India is still not thought of by many as a world power, but in the long run, as its economy and population grow, it will join this esteemed company. It is the 2nd largest population in the world and the 6th largest economy in the world. Its economy is about the size of its old colonial master, the United Kingdom. It is a nuclear power, although we gather it has not weaponized many nukes. Still, it is a poor country, with a per capita income of $1,983 per person (per year…IMF 2017 figures).
Unlike China, there was no draconian one-child policy adopted, so Indian population continued to grow at a rate that is about to catapult it past China as the most populous country in the world. This is expected to happen in 2024Â or 2030, or whenever. Sometime in the next decade.
The population of India for 2017 is estimated at 1.324 million, or 1.3 billion. This puts the population of the world’s largest democracy around four times that of the United States. It is almost four times what its population was in 1951 (361 million). In the early 1950s China had a population around 60 percent larger than India. Now, they are almost equal, although China has considerable more wealth.
The rapid Chinese economic growth has lead to it having a GDP of $12 trillion compared to the more anemic GDP of India at only $2.6 trillion. Needless to say, there is also a big difference in per capita income.
But while China is growing at a rate of only .59% a year and its population is expected to fall, India is expected to continue growing. Its growth rate in 2016 was 1.19% and its fertility rates are 2.45 children per woman (2016 estimate from CIA World Factbook). The annual growth rate remains at over one percent a year. But, the growth rate of the population appears to be declining, like it is in most areas of the world, developed or developing. India does have some emigration and immigration, but the population is so massive that this does not have a huge impact on population growth rates. The demographic pyramid is actually much more pyramidal that the others we have seen, although it is clear towards that bottom of the pyramid that they are now controlling their population growth rates.
India is truly a multi-ethnic, multi-linguistic and multi-religious society. It has something like more than 2,000 ethnic groups. Forgive me if I don’t list them. About 40% of Indians speak Hindi (an Indo-European language) as their first language, and over half the population can speak it. Over 10% of the population speaks English, making it the second largest English speaking country in the world. Religious affiliation is a little more unified with Hindu’s making up almost 80% of the population. There are Muslims (14% or more), Christians (2.3%), Sikhs (1.7%), Buddists, Jainism and even practitioners of Zoroastrianism (look that one up in your Funk and Wagnells). Keep in mind that 14% of 1.3 billion makes this the third largest Muslim population in the world with over 170 million Muslims.
The Indian population is expected to grow for a while. The United Nations predicts the Indian population will be 1.7 billion in 2050. This compares to 402 million for the United States and 1.36 billion for China estimated in 2050.
India economic growth rate has been around 6% a year for the last two decades. Depending on continued economic growth, this is a country that will slowly and surely take its place among the nations of the world.
The question is why India (per capita income $6,490 – 2016) is still so poor compared to China (per capita income $15,5000 – 2016)? Both are reputed to have a high level of corruption but still China is able to generate more wealth by any measure. Until India can overcome its internal problems it is unlikely to become a super power or rival China.
Why do you think India lags China so much?
India was not a corporate darling. More London sphere but not quite as manageable as London’s offshore empire. They are the global version of Europe’s Italy, on a path of their own to a significant degree. Same as always.
This would be a very interesting cross-country comparative analysis to do. Probably something meaningful to learn from it. Suspect it is a multi-faceted issue, as opposed to a couple of “talking points” that explain everything. Not sure I am ready to take this on at this moment.
Very good question. Is there is good answer out there?
I don’t know of a well substantiated answer but I am inclined to agree with Orpheo. It seems to me that India, as well as being very corrupt, does not have the orientation and work culture to promote capitalism. They will remain in the economic doldrums like Italy and Greece.
I am not sure I would be drawing parallels between India and Italy. Looking at per capita income, Italy is the 25th richest country in the world (2017 IMF figures). Its per capita income is $32K. Japan is only two slots above it, at $38K and UK and France are similar ($40K in both cases). Italy is a whole lot closer to them economically than to India. Is the “work culture” of Japan similar to Italy?
India, on the other hand, has a per capita income of $2K. The world average is $11K. China is $9K while Russia is $11K.
As I said, I suspect it is a multi-faceted issue.